Is it possible to define the Fourier series for tangent?
Today I want to derive something that feels fundamentally wrong. I want to derive a Fourier series for \tan(t). And I will do it by calculating the Fourier series of \tan(t+ i a) and take the limit as
\lim_{a \rightarrow 0} \tan(t+i a)
The result will be a series that converges almost nowhere, but nonetheless represents \tan(t), at least when you consider Cesaro sums to assign a value to the series.
We are going to make use of a related geometric series we defined previously in the post on neural synchronization.
\sum^N_{k=0} (e^{i \theta})^k =\sum^N_{k=0}x ^k
with x = e^{i \theta}
\frac{1- e^{i (N+1) \theta}}{1- e^{i \theta}}
However, we will make two small changes. We will sum up to infinity, that is k=\infty and \theta = t - i a
When we do that our sum can converge for a>0. Writing this out explicitly gives us
\sum^{\infty}_{k=0} (e^{it-a})^k = \frac{1}{1- e^{i t-a}}
Now, we can translate between this ratio, and a Fourier series. As
\sum^{\infty}_{k=0} (e^{it-a})^k is basically a complex valued Fourier series with terms e^{ak} for the k-frequency wave.
Now lets see if we can somehow finesse tangent into an expression similar to \frac{1}{1- e^{i t-a}}. Recall that
\tan(\theta) = \frac{\sin(\theta)}{\cos(\theta)}=i\frac{e^{-i\theta}-e^{i\theta}}{e^{-i\theta}+e^{i\theta}}
To simplify things a bit, lets call z=e^{-i\theta}. That give us
i \frac{z-z^{-1}}{z+z^{-1}}
i \frac{z^2-1}{z^2+1}
i-\frac{2i}{z^2+1}
Now we can substitute in z=e^{-i\theta} =e^{ it - a} and we get.
i-\frac{2i}{e^{2(it-a)}+1}
.
We can now convert it to a series, we have
\tan(t - i a) = i + 2i\sum^\infty_{k=1} (-1)^k e^{2 k (i t - a)}
Which is a Fourier series with only positive frequency k.
Now if a \rightarrow 0 , then
\tan(t) = i + 2i \sum^\infty_{k=1} (-1)^k e^{2 i k t}
However this series doesn't converge at all for any value of t. However, we can use Cesaro summation to assign a sign a value to this series. There is a great Mathologer video on this. His "supersum", is the Cesaro summation.
Cesaro summation basically says that if we take the average of the partial sums of a series, and that average converges, then that is the sum of the divergent series. More precisely, we have a series a_k
then
s_k = \sum_{i=0}^k a_i
v_k = \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=0}^k s_i
Lets use a concrete example. Consider the series 1-1+1-1+1-1+\cdots
This its partials sums s_k is
s_k = \{1,0,1,0,1,0,\cdots\}
Then if we compute the average we get
v_k = \{1,\frac{1}{2},\frac{2}{3},\frac{1}{2},\frac{3}{5},\frac{1}{2},\cdots\}
which converges to \frac{1}{2}.
Interestingly this sum occurs in our fourier series for tangent. When time t = n \pi for any integer n we have
\tan(n \pi) = i + 2i\sum^\infty_{k=1} (-1)^k e^{2 k i n \pi}
i+2i\sum^\infty_{k=1} (-1)^k
i +2i(1-1+1-1\cdots)
We already know alternating -1 and 1 is \frac{1}{2}
Which gives us
\tan(n \pi) = i +2i(1-1+1-1\cdots)=0
Now, lets show that for any value of t (except for t=\frac{\pi}{2}+n \pi with integer n) converges. Lets restict ourselves to the term \sum^\infty_{k=1} (-1)^k e^{2 i k t}.
Let us compute v_k. We have
v_k=\sum^k_{m=1} \frac{(-1)^m e^{2 i m t}}{k}
Here we are only going to show it converges to some constant we will call S.
We will use Dirichlet's Test for convergence. It states when a complex series converges. Specifically we have \frac{1}{k} \rightarrow 0 as k\rightarrow \infty. The second part says for fixed t we have |\sum^k_{m=1} (-1)^m e^{2 i m t}|<M for all k. This basically means that the sum can oscillate between values M. This clearly fails for t=\frac{\pi}{2}+n \pi as |\sum^k_{m=1} (-1)^m e^{2 i m \frac{\pi}{2}+n}|=|\sum^k_{m=1} (-1)^m (-1)^m |= \sum^k_{m=1} 1 = \infty
These will be the normal places where tan(t) is undefined.
However, at all other times there is indeed a maximum value. We know that \sum^k_{m=1} (-1)^m e^{2 i m t} = \frac{1-e^{2 i (k+1) t}}{1+ e^{2 i t}}<|\frac{1-e^{2 i (k+1) t}}{1+ e^{2 i t}}|\leq |\frac{2}{1+ e^{2 i t}}| = M
.
These two conditions, \frac{1}{k}\rightarrow 0, and that M is finite, satisfy the Dirichlet's test. Thus or average partials will converge to some sum S for all times that are not t=\frac{\pi}{2}+n \pi.
While that's a long round about way to show that our series in Cesaro summable, now we can make use of some very nice properties of Cesaro sums. Specifically, we have multiplication by a constant or
c \sum^\infty_{m=1} a_k = \sum^\infty_{m=1} c a_k
We have shift, that is if a_0=0
\sum^\infty_{m=1} a_k = \sum^\infty_{m=0} a_k
With that we can now write
S = \sum^\infty_{k=1} (-1)^k e^{2 k (i t)}
-e^{-2 i t}S = \sum^\infty_{k=1} (-1)^{k-1} e^{2 (k-1) (i t)}
Using the shift property we have
-e^{-2 i t}S = 1 + \sum^\infty_{k=1} (-1)^k e^{2 k (i t)}
Subtract the the equations give
(1+e^{-2 i t})S = \sum^\infty_{k=1} (-1)^k e^{2 k (i t)}-\sum^\infty_{k=1} (-1)^k e^{2 k (i t)}-1 =-1
(1+e^{-2 i t })S = -1
Rearranging this gives
S =\frac{-1}{1+e^{-2 i t }}
Which is a valid value for S for all t except t=\frac{\pi}{2}+n \pi.
Now we know that
\tan(t) = i + 2i S
Computing that we get
\tan(t) = i + 2i \frac{-1}{1+e^{-2 i t }}
\tan(t) = i\frac{1+e^{-2 i t }}{1+e^{-2 i t }} + 2i \frac{-1}{1+e^{-2 i t }}
\tan(t) = i\frac{1+e^{-2 i t }-2}{1+e^{-2 i t }}
\tan(t) = i\frac{-1+e^{-2 i t }}{1+e^{-2 i t }}
\tan(t) = i\frac{e^{it}}{e^{it}}\frac{-1+e^{-2 i t }}{1+e^{-2 i t }}
\tan(t) = i \frac{-e^{it}+e^{- i t }}{e^{it}+e^{- i t }}
Thus we have shown that even though our Fourier series does not define a convergent sum, it none the less converges everywhere to tan(t)(except for t=\frac{\pi}{2}+n \pi).
Thus we can say that tan(t) has the Fourier series
\tan(t) = i + 2i \sum^\infty_{k=1} (-1)^k e^{2 i k t}
Author: Alexander White
Author: Alexander White
留言
張貼留言